P&F Campaigns in Santa Cruz County
Local Candidates
State Senate
There are no Peace and Freedom Party candidates for the State
Senate in Santa Cruz County.
U.S. House of Representatives
Joe Williams is the Peace and Freedom Party
candidate for U.S. House of Representatives in the 17th District, which
includes Santa Cruz, Soquel, Aptos, Freedom and Watsonville (basically
all of the county except for the mountains),
all of Monterey County,
and all of San Benito County.
He came in fourth of five candidates, behind the incumbent Democrat, Sam Farr,
who was re-elected, the Republican and the Green, but ahead of the Libertarian.
As of November 12th, he received 1,195 votes (1.7%) in Santa Cruz County (fourth in
the county), of 1,987 (1.2%) in the district.
State Assembly
There are no Peace and Freedom Party candidates for State
Assembly in Santa Cruz County.
Local Non-partisan Offices
The webmaster
for this website is not aware of any endorsements of candidates for local
non-partisan offices by the local Peace and Freedom Party organization.
Peace and Freedom Party Central Committees
The elected members of the Peace and Freedom Party Central Committees
from Santa Cruz County are:
- Shushannah Akin
- Steve Argue (Santa Cruz)
- Jennifer Ann Gosk (Santa Cruz)
- Bernard Klitzner (write-in)
- David Lucier (write-in)
- Maureen Smith (Aptos)
- Michael J. Smith (Aptos)
- Joe Williams (Santa Cruz) (placed on CCs by virtue of his
nomination for Congress)
Local Measures
There are a number of county, municipal and regional measures that will
be on the ballot November 2nd in Santa Cruz County, and the Peace and Freedom
Party considered those for the County and for the City of Santa Cruz:
- Measure J (County of Santa Cruz): Half-cent sales tax for transportation
improvements (mainly widening Highway 1).
Peace and Freedom urged you to vote NO on J.
With our opposition, Measure J failed by a vote as of November 12th of
41,420 (42.8%) to 55,371 (57.2%).
- Measure K (County of Santa Cruz): Repeal 911 fee ordinance for
unincorporated areas.
Peace and Freedom urged you to vote NO on K.
With our opposition, Measure K failed by a vote as of November 12th of
14,337 (28.8%) to 35,365 (71.2%).
- Measure L (City of Santa Cruz): Amend city charter to allow city to hold
special elections by mail-only ballots. Peace and Freedom decided not to take a
position on this measure.
Measure L passed by a vote as of November 12th of
13,817 (64.2%) to 7,700 (35.8%).
- Measure M (City of Santa Cruz): Amend city charter to allow city to clarify
definition of term limits. Peace and Freedom urged you to vote YES on M.
With our support, Measure M passed by a vote as of November 12th of
15,987 (73.4%) to 5,782 (26.6%).
- Measure N (City of Santa Cruz): Amend city charter to allow city to publish
ordinances by publishing them on the Internet.
Peace and Freedom urged you to
vote YES on N.
With our support, Measure N passed by a vote as of November 12th of
16,298 (76.5%) to 5,005 (23.5%).
- Measure O (City of Santa Cruz): Amend city charter to allow city to maintain
public records in files rather than bound books. Peace and Freedom urged you to
vote YES on O.
With our support, Measure O passed by a vote as of November 12th of
18,316 (86.1%) to 2,962 (13.9%).
Statewide Candidates
President of the United States
The Peace and Freedom Party's presidential ticket, chosen at our state
convention, held the weekend of July 30th and August 1st in Los Angeles,
consists of Leonard Peltier for President of the U.S.
and Janice Jordan for Vice-President of the U.S.
The Peltier/Jordan ticket came in fifth of six tickets on the ballot statewide,
with 24,500 votes for 0.2% as of November 12th. In Santa Cruz County, the
Peltier/Jordan ticket came in fifth with 317 votes for 0.3%. There were also
624 write-in votes (0.6%) for President, so the P&F ticket may also have
finished behind the Nader/Camejo campaign.
United States Senator
The Peace and Freedom Party candidate for U.S. Senator is
Marsha Feinland. She came in third of five
candidates on the ballot statewide, as of November 12th with 213,354
votes for 1.9%. In Santa Cruz County, she came in third with,
as of November 12th, 2,614 votes for 2.6%.
Statewide Measures
There were sixteen propositions on the statewide ballot November 2nd,
assigned proposition numbers 59 to 72, plus 60A and 1A. The
Peace and Freedom Party took positions on most of them.
- Proposition 62 (voter pamphlet summary and arguments available as a
190 KB PDF,
full text as a
301 KB PDF):
"No Choice" initiative would put all candidates from all parties
on a single blanket primary ballot for all partisan offices except President.
Only the top two primary-election candidates with most votes for an office,
whether or not members of the same party, would go on to the general election.
This is similar to the election systems used in France and Louisiana,
resulting in runoffs between open racists like Jacques LePen and David Duke
and corrupt establishment politicians, with no progressive alternative
allowed on that ballot. The proponents of this initiative think it will
guarantee that socially-moderate, pro-business candidates like Democrats
Gray Davis and Dianne Feinstein and Republicans Richard Riordan and Arnold
Schwarzenegger won't lose to labor oriented progressives or religious right
conservatives in their party primaries.
Peace and Freedom recommended a NO vote on this initiative.
With our opposition, Proposition 62 failed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 4,667,924 (46.1%) Yes to 5,450,429 (53.9%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 44,022 (47.9%) Yes to 47,763 (52.1%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 66: (voter pamphlet summary and arguments available as a
175 KB PDF,
full text as a
200 KB PDF):
This initiative circulated by FACTS would modify three strikes law by
requiring that second and third strikes be serious or violent felonies and
narrowing definitions of what crimes are "serious or violent" and
when two convictions constitute separate strikes. Applies retroactively to
reduce the long sentences some prisoners received for petty crimes. Also
increases penalties for some sex crimes against children.
Peace and Freedom recommended a YES vote on this initiative.
Despite our support, Proposition 66 failed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 5,074,538 (47.0%) Yes to 5,717,783 (53.0%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 63,386 (65.5%) Yes to 33,428 (34.5%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 72: (voter pamphlet summary and arguments available as a
197 KB PDF,
full text as a
187 KB PDF): Referendum on John Burton's
SB 2
(which requires some employers to provide health insurance plans for some
employees).
Peace and Freedom opposed the referendum and supported keeping the law, as a
step forward even though we prefer a publicly funded health care system
not tied to workers' jobs. This meant a YES vote on the ballot.
Despite our support, Proposition 72 failed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 5,154,444 (48.9%) Yes to 5,380,464 (51.1%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 54,710 (57.2%) Yes to 41,097 (42.8%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 59: SCA 1,
"Access to government information".
Peace and Freedom recommended a YES vote on this constitutional amendment.
With our support, Proposition 59 passed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 8,522,117 (83.4%) Yes to 1,700,285 (16.6%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 82,286 (88.4%) Yes to 10,885 (11.6%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 60: "Election Rights of Political Parties".
Peace and Freedom recommended a YES vote on this constitutional amendment.
With our support, Proposition 60 passed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 6,595,408 (67.5%) Yes to 3,180,543 (32.5%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 60,324 (68.4%) Yes to 27,924 (31.6%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 60A: "Surplus Property".
The State Peace and Freedom Party did not take a position on this measure, but
the Santa Cruz County Peace and Freedom Pary recommends a YES vote
on this constitutional amendment.
Proposition 60A passed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 7,095,344 (73.2%) Yes to 2,598,587 (26.8%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 63,834 (71.9%) Yes to 25,016 (28.1%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 61: Bonds for Children's Hospitals.
Peace and Freedom recommended a NO vote on this bond measure. The bonds are
for a generally good purpose, but our general opposition to bonds determined
our recommendation.
Despite our opposition, Proposition 61 passed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 6,014,986 (58.0%) Yes to 4,361,609 (42.0%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 59,914 (63.8%) Yes to 34,109 (36.2%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 63: (voter pamphlet summary and arguments available as a
143 KB PDF,
full text as a
171 KB PDF):
Tax millionaires to support mental health services.
Peace and Freedom recommended a YES vote on this initiative.
With our support, Proposition 63 passed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 5,612,939 (53.5%) Yes to 4,895,365 (46.5%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 62,773 (65.5%) Yes to 33,076 (34.5%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 64: "Limits on Private Enforcement of Unfair Business
Competition Laws".
Peace and Freedom recommended a NO vote on this measure, which would make
it more difficult to go after corporate crime.
Despite our opposition, Proposition 64 passed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 6,000,175 (59.0%) Yes to 4,175,249 (41.0%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 43,932 (47.9%) Yes to 47,772 (52.1%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 65: "Local Government Funds, Revenues. State Mandates".
Peace and Freedom recommended a NO vote on this measure. The solution to local
government funding problems is not to lock into place reliance on regressive
taxes that distort land use decisions.
With our opposition, Proposition 65 failed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 3,541,383 (37.3%) Yes to 5,929,464 (62.7%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 31,268 (37.4%) Yes to 52,330 (62.6%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 67: Telephone tax to pay for Emergency Medical Services.
Peace and Freedom recommended a NO vote on this measure; emergency medical
services should be properly funded, but not by a regressive tax that costs
poor people more than the rich. Peace and Freedom advocates a single-payer
health care system funded by progressive taxation, which would pay for
emergency medical services without the need for any special, dedicated
funding.
With our opposition, Proposition 67 failed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 2,924,997 (28.1%) Yes to 7,480,285 (71.9%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 35,555 (38.4%) Yes to 56,797 (61.6%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 68: Casino gambling for card-rooms and race tracks. If
Indian tribes that run casinos don't accept new compacts within 90 days,
this measure would allow sixteen specific card-rooms and race tracks to
run casinos with slot machines.
Peace and Freedom recommended a NO vote on this measure.
With our opposition, Proposition 68 failed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 1,718,528 (16.1%) Yes to 8,950,126 (83.9%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 11,934 (12.6%) Yes to 82,638 (87.4%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 69: DNA samples from arrestees. This would allow police
to take DNA samples from anyone they arrest for a felony, even if the
case is so weak the District Attorney declines to prosecute it, and
enter it into a statewide database.
Peace and Freedom recommended a NO vote on this measure.
Despite our opposition, Proposition 69 passed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 6,549,720 (62.0%) Yes to 4,021,749 (38.0%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 49,417 (51.3%) Yes to 46,920 (48.7%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 70: "Tribal Gaming Compacts. Exclusive Gaming Rights.
Contributions to State". This measure would recognize the sovereignty
of California Indian tribes by giving tribal casinos on reservation lands
a monopoly on casino gambling in California, in exchange for financial
contributions to the state government.
Peace and Freedom recommended a YES vote on this measure.
Depite our support, Proposition 70 failed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 2,493,273 (23.5%) Yes to 8,083,522 (76.5%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 21,282 (22.4%) Yes to 73,671 (77.6%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 71: Bonds for Stem Cell Research.
Peace and Freedom recommended a NO vote on this measure.
The bonds are for a generally good purpose, but our general opposition to
bonds determined our recommendation.
Despite our opposition, Proposition 71 passed by a statewide vote as of November
12th of 6,370,852 (59.1%) Yes to 4,419,373 (40.9%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 69,360 (70.4%) Yes to 29,272 (29.6%) No as
of November 12th.
- Proposition 1A: "Protection of Local Government Revenues".
The State Peace and Freedom Party did not take a position on this measure,
which is the governor's and legislature's replacement for Proposition 65,
but the Santa Cruz County Peace and Freedom Pary recommends a YES vote
on this constitutional amendment.
Proposition 1A passed by a statewide vote as of November 12th of
8,591,021 (83.7%) Yes to 1,677,217 (16.3%) No.
In Santa Cruz County, the vote was 80,098 (86.4%) Yes to 12,657 (13.6%) No as
of November 12th.
This page was last updated on 15 November 2004.
Back to P&F Campaign 2004 Counties List
Back to P&F Campaign 2004 Home Page